Thursday, December 24, 2009

Benifits Of Drinking Coconut Milk

Presentation Iceland

Like every year, here is our night in Milan for the presentation of travel in Iceland:

Thursday, April 22, 2010, 21:00
Ambrosianeum Cultural Foundation - Hall Falk
Via delle Ore, Milan 3


Given the limited number of seats in the hall we would be grateful if you could tell us your presence

Friday, December 18, 2009

How Much Does A White Owl Cost?

2010 Climate and Eco-ignorant-arrogant

reading and listening to nothing short of delirious proclamations from Copenhagen we have often wondered whether we were really the only shook his head in front of ideas as to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius ...". No, luckily we were not the only ones
http://www.meteogiornale.it/notizia/16816-1-clima-ignoranti-ed-eco-arroganti

Friday, December 4, 2009

How Freeze Long Bucket Margarita

Every age has its bulbs

Man kann nicht elektrisches Licht und Radio-apparat benutzen, in modern Krankheitsfällen medizinische und klinische Mittel in Anspruch nehmen und gleichzeitig an die Geister- und Wunderwelt des Neuen Testaments glauben.
(Rudolf Bultmann, Neues Testament und Mythologie. Das Problem der Entmythologisierung der neutestamentlichen Verkündigung , 1941)

It is historically unjustified to suppose that things unbelievable in modern Marburg could not have been experienced in ancient Palestine. (...) What is really kaum glaublich is that such a statement should have been made by a modern teacher of religion (...) who might have been expected to know something of the phenomena of ecstatic cults.
(Morton Smith, "The Origins and History of the Transfiguration Story", Union Seminar Quarterly Review 36 [1980], 39-44, p. 41)

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Does A Nose Piercing Scab Inside My Nose

Sample taken the piss editorial

It seems that even in France , alas, the book was published by Hans Weder Gottesherrschaf und Gegenwart, 1993, translated here in Italy for Paideia in 2005 ( this time, and God's sovereignty ).
Weder is probably the last great representative of exegesis of school (post) bultmanniana. Although dated 1993, the book in question is a kind of hermeneutic essay eschatology of Jesus' characteristic of this school - by Bultmann himself Käsemann and Jüngel - trying to build some kind of hermeneutical castles ad Jesuit kingdom God Bultmann, however, had the good taste not to project his hermeneutic Existential Jesus, letting them remain in place (the apocalypse). Not so his disciples, including precisely our Weder.
There is no need to dwell here on the elegant musings of Weder (like, with the announcement of its close proximity to the worship of God, Jesus replaces the chronological understanding of the apocalyptic, its understanding kairological, that the future of God goes right into this, like everything else in the part, putting an end to the power that the past with its present and blame it on the setting in motion the human existence bla bla bla).
Anyone interested in issues of theological hermeneutics eschatology of Jesus (because of this if tratta, e di storia nient'affatto ...), if it pure compressed libretto, che costa pochissimo, è breve e, nonostante the elucubrazioni, spun through abbastanza Liscio. Ciò che
that it interessatipossono è invece che presentazione del libro the hanno dato Editions du Cerf. Citiamola:

This little book by Hans Weder, published in 1993 in Germany, "is an important element of the contemporary debate about the historical Jesus and the eschatological question (Elian Cuvillier). The author, who claims postbultmannienne tradition, is committing a polemic against some researchers of the "third quest" who see the historical Jesus a representative of the Jewish apocalyptic which he would share the worldview and eschatology. Hans Weder, however, relieve the originality of the eschatology of Jesus and early Christianity through reflection on the understanding of time. Chronological representation of apocalyptic that the wicked old aeon will give way to the new aeon, the kingdom of God, is abolished. The kairos is fulfilled, there is no discontinuity between the eons, which is accomplished in this does not herald the end of time, but it is a fragment of God's future that emerges so lightning in our present. It

in modo cui viene riassunta la posizione di Weder è certamente esatto. E altrettanto esatto è che per Weder, così come per Käsemann, l'annuncio gesuano del regno di Dio, pur prendendo la "carne" (immagini, linguaggio) dall'apocalittica giudaica, se ne distingue essenzialmente (e lo stesso vale ovviamente rispetto all'annuncio apocalittico del Battista). In tutto questo il libro di Weder pare l'epitome perfetta di quella corrente di studi (e che coincide appunto con i post-bultmanniani) che si suole definire New o Second Quest.
La cosa interessante però è che l'Editore francese presenta il libro come se A) costituisse un elemento importante del dibattito contemporaneo sull'escatologia di Gesù; B) ingaggiasse una polemics with the proponents of the "apocalyptic Jesus" of the Third Quest.
On the basis of such a presentation, everyone would expect some kind of critical discussion of the work of Sanders and Meier (not to say Fredriksen, Allison, Ehrman - and somewhat Wright), Third-Questers excellent attributing to Jesus a strong apocalyptic eschatology chronologically imminent.
But in what our poor reader encountering disappointment when, just come home and browsing the bibliography of volume, to find that is not mentioned a single book or article in English (with the noble exception of good old Liddell-Scott!), When The Third Quest (mean whatever you want with it) is known to "stuff Anglophone, or at least it was in 1993 (in the second half of the 90 different contributions coming from France, Germany and Scandinavia).
So after the high-sounding proclamations, you realize that certains chercheurs de la troisième quête which Weder argues are in fact ... Werner Georg Kümmel and Erich Grasser!
Du Cerf Congratulations dear!
________________
PS Someone will ask, perhaps for the French edition , Weder decided to update his text, adding un'infuocata appendix against Sanders, Meier and his compatriots apocalyptic Becker and Lüdemann (Theissen and I would say)? It may be doubted. Weder's book was an example of self-isolation and typically Teutonic (see also books Gnilka) in 1993, it is doubtful that it has changed its mindset exegetical in the meantime. Moreover, the publisher says that this is an updated edition, and the tiny number of pages (98 - 85 but the Italian edition is the index that is already on page 7) does not let it not be assumed.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Best Tattoo Ideas For Skinny Dudes

Karahnjukar

After a few years back for a time on each of Project Karahnjukar . Who was in Iceland with us know the story.
Following are two videos. The first is an excerpt of the documentary "Karahnjukar" we realized in 2006, the second is a trailer of the documentary "Dreamland" produced by the Icelandic author Andri Snær Magnasson. Enjoy


Monday, November 9, 2009

St Croix Pellet Stoves 2 Flashing

Jesus according to the unanimous testimony of Mark and Q

As is known, including Marco and the Q tradition there are a number of important overlaps. I think Benedict Viviano has written a few years ago an article on this topic. I will try to read it as soon as possible. In the meantime, I offer below a list of these overlaps. In a second step, if necessary, we'll draw some comments.

______________________

Many people from Judea / from the region flock to Jordan to be baptized by John in the water, which calls for repentance in the face of the baptism in fire / spirit will be managed by the strongest who comes after him (cf. . Q from 3.2 to 9, from 3.16 to 17 / / MC 1.4 to 5; 1:7-8).

Jesus was baptized by John, and on this occasion sees the heavens opened, experience the indwelling of the Spirit and the divine sonship (see Q 3.21 to 22 / / Mark 1:9-11).

Jesus is led by the Spirit into the desert, where for forty days tempted by Satan (see Q 4.1 to 2 / / Mk 1:12-13).

Jesus comes in Nazara / in his own country (see Q 4.16 / / MC 6.1).

Jesus warns that the measure with which you measure will be measured (see Q 6.38 / / Mk 4:24).

Jesus emphasizes that the essential thing is to do the will of God (see Q 6.46 / / Mk 3:35).

Jesus enters Capernaum (see Q 7.1 / / MC 2.1).

Jesus applies to John's prophecy of Isaiah about the messenger (from 7.24 to 27 Q / / MC 1.2).

Jesus instructs the disciples to the mission: not carry or purse or bag, stick no / yes (10.3 Q / / Mk 6.8); into the houses, a message announcing the eschatological (nearness of the kingdom / repentance), and healing the sick (cf. Q 10.5 to 9 / / 6.10 to 13 Mc). Shake the sand / earth from shoes or from under your feet, in the case of non-acceptance (see Q 10.10-12 / / Mk 6:11).

Jesus says that anyone who receives them / receives one such child in his name, and he welcomes the one who sent him (see Q 10.16 / / Mk 9:37).

Jesus was accused by some / scribes to cast out demons with the help of Beelzebul. Jesus says that a kingdom and a house that is divided in themselves, can not stand (see 11.14 to 18 Q / / 3.22 to 25 Mc), [and that the kingdom of God is now / Satan's end (see Q 11.19 b / / Mk 3:26).

Jesus says that the house of a strong can not be sacked, but the strongest one wins / ties it, then it can be looted (see Q 11.21-22 / / Mk 3:27).

Jesus says that whoever is not with him is against him or who is not against him is for him (see Q at 11.23 / / Mk 9.40). Some

/ Pharisees asked Jesus for a sign. Jesus points out that this generation asks for a sign, but says that it will receive some / any except the sign of Jonah (see Q 11,16.29-30 / / Mk 8:11-12).

Jesus notes that a lamp should not be placed in a hidden place / under a bushel, or under the bed, but on the chandelier (see Q 11.33 / / bc Mk 4.21).

Jesus railed against the Pharisees / exegetes of Law, who love places of honor at banquets and in the synagogues and to be greeted in the streets (see Q 11.42-44 / / Mc 12.38 c-39).

Jesus ruled that there is nothing covered / hidden / secret that will not be exposed / revealed / known / come to light (see Q 12.2 / / Mk 4:22).

Jesus warns that the position taken against him before men, the Son of man shall be ratified before the angels (see Q 12.8-9 / / Mark 8.38).

Jesus warns that anyone who says a word against a man (a son of man), he will be forgiven any curse pronounced by the children of men will be forgiven them, but who says a word / blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, not the will be forgiven (see Q 12.10 / / 3.28 to 29 Mc).

Jesus invites his disciples to not worry about what to say when it will be brought before the synagogues, because the Spirit will teach what to say / speak (see Q 12.11-12 / / Mc 13.9 to 11).

Jesus is not recommended to have a treasure on earth / sell what you have, and to be quite a treasure in heaven (cf. 12.33-34 / / Mk 10:21 b).

Jesus exhorts his disciples to be ready / to watch, as the Son of Man / the landlord is unexpected in an hour / not known (see Q 12.40 / / Mk 13:35).

wonders what Jesus compare the kingdom of God is like a mustard seed, which sown, grows into a tree / large vegetable in whose shadow / between the branches of which can shelter the birds of the sky (see Q 13.18-19 / / Mark 4:30-32).

Jesus emphasizes that to be his disciples must be taken la propria croce (cfr. Q   14,27 // Mc 8,34b), e ammonisce che chi vuol salvare la sua vita, la perderà, e chi perde la sua vita per causa sua, la salverà (cfr. Q 17,33 // Mc 8,35).

Gesù osserva che il sale e buono, ma se diventa insipido, con che cosa lo si salerà/gli si renderà il sapore? (cfr. Q 14,34 // Mc 9,50).

Gesù sentenzia che chiunque ripudia sua moglie e ne sposa un’altra, commette adulterio, e che chi sposa una ripudiata/la moglie che ha ripudiato il marito e ne sposa un altro, commette adulterio (cfr. Q 16,18 // Mc 10,11-12).

Gesù ammonisce che per colui che causa scandali, sarebbe meglio per lui che gli fosse appesa al collo una macina da mulino e venisse gettato nel mare (cfr. Q 17,1-2 // Mc 9,42).

Gesù assicura che chi, avendo fede, dice a questo sicomoro/a questo monte: Sradicati/Levati e sìì trapiantato/gettati nel mare, esso gli obbedirà (cfr. Q 17,6 // Mc 11,23).

Gesù mette in guardia i discepoli dal seguire/credere a chi dica loro: Ecco, è nel deserto/il Cristo è qui, ecco è nelle stanze interne/il Cristo è là (cfr. Q 17,23 // Mc 13,21).

[Gesù parla di posti/troni su cui i discepoli siederanno nella sua gloria/nella gloria del Figlio dell’uomo/nel regno (cfr. Q 22,28-30 / / Mc 10,37.39)]

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

How Long To Marine Batteries Last

historiographic The Significance of the Bradford (Caird) Family



The publisher of Brescia, Paideia has just published a book translated and English exegete George Bradford Caird, language and imagery in Bible ( The Language and Imagery of the Bible ), originally published in 1980. A work that the author describes as "a textbook for elementary semantics exemplified by drawing the Old and New Testament" (p. 14).
Personally, I have got to read all, or even for the most part, neither in English nor Italian, and I do not think I can overcome this "missing" for a long time.
Nevertheless, for what concerns the main subject of this blog, the book Caird, even the figure of Caird, has an undeniable importance historiography.
begin with the figure: GB Caird, professor at the glorious University of Oxford ( "I listened to other students talking about Caird 'defending the walls of Oxford Against the German invasion'" , reports picturesquely MJ Borg in "A Temperate Case for a non-eschatological Jesus "Foundations & Facets Forum 2 (1986) 81-102), was the Doktorvater two Jesus Questers of the most popular in the last two decades: the time Anglican bishop NT Wright and his American buddy Marcus J. Borg, coordinating their doctoral dissertations on Paul and the politics of Jesus instead
Coming to the book, the last chapter, the 14th, is dedicated to "the language of eschatology." Well, this is a fundamental element for its direct and decisive influence that had in how his "godchildren" Wright and Borg have conceived the relationship between Jesus el'escatologia.
Here is clearly not possible to go into details of the matter, I prefer to leave the floor directly to the three scholars, bringing some significant citations.

Caird:
"My proposal can be illustrated in three propositions: (...) 1. The biblical authors believed the letter that the world had a beginning in the past and would have a purpose in the future. 2. They regularly use the language of the end of the world in a metaphorical sense to talk about what they knew well not be the end of the world. 3. As with all other uses of the metaphor, it must be remembered that it is probable in the sign of a misunderstanding by the literalness of the audience, and it is possible confusion of boundaries between vehicle and tenor by the speaker "(GB CAIRD, Op. cit. , p. 311).

BORG:
“The threat tradition of the synoptics thus contains two elements. On the one hand, decisions taken for or against the mission of Jesus would have eternal consequences (e.g. Mk 9:43-48; Lk 10:12-15 par., 11:31-32 par.; 12:8-9 par.; Mt 25,31-46). But this was not imminent, nor was this the primary source of urgency. [Si tratta del punto n. 1 di Caird]. What was imminent was the historical consequence of continuing to pursue the quest for holiness as separation (…): the threatened destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple (..). That was the crisis Jesus announced to his contemporaries. (…) only the imagery of cosmic world disorder and Judgement Would Have Been Adequate to speak of the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple (...). The position maintained here, then, Is that the transcendent imagery (...) Which speaks of Imminent universal disorder, is consistent with the threat of the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Such language only Was Sufficient to express the Significance of the Destruction of Jerusalem [and this is the No 2 of Caird]. "
(MJ BORG, Conflict, Holiness and Politics in the Teaching of Jesus , 2nd ed., Trinity Press International, Harrisburg, 1998, pp. 227-229, 1st ed. 1984).

WRIGHT:
"Within the mainline Jewish writings of this period (…), there is virtually no evidence that Jews were expecting the end of the space-time universe. There is abundant evidence that they, like Jeremiah and others before them, knew a good metaphor when they saw one, and used cosmic imagery to bring out the full theological significance of cataclysmic socio-political events” (N.T. WRIGHT, The New Testament and the People of God , SPCK/Fortress, London/Minneapolis, 1992, p. 333).
“(…) the imagery of Mark 13,24-5, 27 can be easily understood. These verses, as Caird urged, are not ‘flat and literal prose’. They do not speak of the collapse or end of the space-time universe. They are (…) typical Jewish imagery for events within the present order that are felt and perceived as ‘cosmic’ or, as we should say, as ‘earth-shattering’. More particularly, they are regular Jewish imagery for events that bring the story of Israel to its appointed climax. (…) The result of ‘the vindication of the son of man’ is that exile will at last be over (…). The promises to Jerusalem, to Zion, are now transferred to Jesus and his people. Meanwhile Jerusalem herself has become the great enemy, the city whose destruction signals the liberation of the true people of God” (N.T. WRIGHT, Jesus and the Victory of God , SPCK/Fortress, London/Minneapolis, 1996, pp. 362-363).

[Wright absolutizes point No 2 of Caird, leaving completely drop the point No 1 - and introducing compensation - as is clearly seen - instead of "crass literalism" that he attributes to the traditional interpretation of eschatology, a no less "crass" and blatant apologetics reading, including well said Paula Fredriksen: "This hypothesis is parsimonious and Coherent, offering the Simplest explanation so far of the rise of Chrisitanity: Jesus created it" (P. Fredriksen, "What You See Is What You Get: Context and Content in Current Research on the Historical Jesus" Theology Today 52 (1995) 75-97, p. 89)].

the reader to judge the plausibility of the interpretation offered by the family of eschatology Bradford.

Prognosis Secondary Liver Cancer

Summary thesis JW

Monday, November 2, 2009

Monopoly Canada Electronic Banking Instructions

Questions and reflections before opening the book Pieter Craffert

Over the next few days (which may be a couple of weeks) I would like to have fun reading: Pieter F. Craffert, The Life of a Galilean Shaman: Jesus of Nazareth in Anthropological-Historical Perspective , Cascade Books, Eugene, 2008. The idea to cover certain aspects of the figure of Jesus (exorcisms, healings, revelations) through the trans-cultural model of the shaman is not new, in fact I think that has already been "cleared" in the Italian publishing a contribution (now I can not remember exactly who - perhaps John Pilch?) in the volume edited by W. Stegemann - BJ Malina - G. Theissen, The new historical Jesus , Paideia, 2006. The monograph Craffert should, however, I believe, be the fullest expression to date of this interpretative.
In fact, I'm tempted to say that an important step in this direction had already done more than twenty years ago, Marcus J. Borg (see Jesus: A New Vision. Spirit, Culture and the Life of Discipleship , Harper San Francisco, San Francisco, 1987), which he played - in turn connected to the thesis of G. Vermes on charismatic Galilean - Jesus as a Spirit person "who is in touch with the beneficial power" of the other realm, "and can mediarne experience to others, particularly through the development of a" wisdom subversive, "which heads a precise political practice" inclusiveness "(and anti-nationalist or anti-zealot, a characterization that it will be less in more recent work of Borg in 2007).
But even without having read the book, I've got to understand that Craffert with his work means to distance themselves from all Jesus Questers in general (including Borg and the Jesus Seminar), all "guilty" to his eyes adhere to the sterile "authenticity paradigm" and Traditionsgeschichte.
And this is already one of the big question marks with which I come near to the book: Why oppose anthropological approach and historical-critical approach? From this point of view, seem at first glance, shared some findings that Craffert moves his colleague Andries Van Aard ( http://www.up.ac.za/dspace/bitstream/2263/7431/1/ VanAarde_Anthropological% 282008% 29.pdf ), which, to be precise - we appreciate the work Craffert - feels that the integration, rather than either / or between the two aprrocci.
And another big question mark mi si è profilato innanzi sfogliando (molto, troppo, velocemente) le pagine di The Life of a Galilean Shaman , là dove Craffert si sofferma sui due aspetti centrali del "messaggio" di Gesù - il regno di Dio e il Figlio dell'uomo - , argomentando che essi, una volta considerati all'interno del modello di quella specifica figura sociale che è lo sciamano, cessano di essere concetti o simboli che fanno riferimento ad "entità esterne" e oggettivabili (il Figlio dell'uomo come essere celeste e il regno di Dio come realtà realizzabile), e diventano, in qualche modo, semplici espressioni, culturalmente determinate, dell'esperienza visionaria del divino vissuta dallo sciamano.
In poche parole, The second big question with which I come near to the book of Craffert is: if the kingdom of God is not merely a linguistic coding of a mystical experience, how is it that our shaman Jesus ends his life on a cross as a political rebel?
We'll see if the read end to confirm, or to respond to clear (such as sore places) these points of my original question.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Denise Milani Skin Forum Computer

Die Wiederkehr des Doktor Weiss

Dear readers (?)
here I am back after a long period of enforced absence due to the need to write and support my thesis of Jesus sull'escatologia
To compensate for the fast that I have imposed - But who gives a touch of apocalitticità which never hurts, though some say Jesus do not fast at all, being " the proverbial party animal" whose motto was " to celebrate, to celebrate, to celebrate " (see RW Funk, Honest to Jesus , 1996) - you can console yourself with the fact that since your last doctor now, there is no doubt expect a significant increase in quality and depth of content of the blog. Or not?

Friday, October 9, 2009

Beach Painting Red Dress Umbrella

Nostalgia Reykjavik? Reconnaissance

Then salts machine. Here, for you, ten minutes of Rúntur of Friday, August 14, 2009. No big deal, just a quiet stroll along Laugavegur (shopping street) just before midnight.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

How Old To Brazilian Wax

the Aeolian

The first survey was completed by 90 Degrees East to the Aeolian Islands. Goals achieved and explore: Stromboli, Salina and Filicudi. After reading books and guides have told us that as a visitor experience that emotion, that we prefer to seek leave to speak perfume pictures and movies.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Does Pinot Noir Expire

Iceland August 15 to 27




Friday, August 14, 2009

Pokemon Battle Revolution Deutsch Rom



One evening, walking through the center of Reykjavik



Wednesday, August 12, 2009

How The Romantic Age Started

101 Reykjavik Iceland August 1 to 13

Ends Today the journey "of Vicenza." E 'was for us a very good adventure. Our emphasis will never be the same and will struggle to fall asleep without the "Briscolon (Brisco'eon) goodnight.




Saturday, June 20, 2009

What Is The Bluetooth Notebook Mouse 5000 Pin

Käsemann Ernst und das Problem des Bratwurst-Jesu


now it has become customary to warn against excessive use of the criterion of discontinuity or double dissomiglianza. Ma che cosa in consisterebbe quest'uso esagerato? Ernst Käsemann it does offer a esempio eccellente. If he considers breve passo seguente:

The difficult problem of preaching as this was conditioned by an apocalyptic expectation. This problem is also difficult because we can not prove with certainty the authenticity, where there is an agreement with Judaism or with late post-Easter community.

dunque, per Käsemann, the collocare annuncio di Gesu sul regno di Dio nell'alveo apocalyptic eschatology (or, loosely, "apocalyptic") would be problematic for the simple reason that you can not be sure where the tradition of Jesus is shown in accordance with the "late Judaism" (today: mediogiudaismo or Second Temple Judaism) or the post-Easter community. This position will be completely reversed from EP Sanders, who, so far more sensible, considers that the only way to get to the historical Jesus is to follow the traces of man by whom Jesus was the starting point (the Baptist) and of those who in turn began with Jesus (the early community). Now, Since the profile of one and the case has marked apocalyptic-eschatological, the sense of the historian concludes that the same was true for Jesus This topic is now tagged by Bart Ehrman as follows: the beginning and the end as the key I'm the middle .

What Käsemann, instead, I call it the 'Bratwurst argument: if there is only about Jesus, apocalyptic eschatology, it follows that Jesus had to be ... a Bratwurst. A supporter of today's Bratwurst-Jesu is JD Crossan, who responded to the continuity sanders (Obiettatogli by Allison), referring to Gandhi, who was an island of peace in a context of violence and oppression before and after him. But in the case of Gandhi talking about a general climate, or macrocontesto, from whom he differs; the speech is much different for Jesus who was a disciple of disciples and had an apocalyptic doomsday.

But the last straw was that after clearing the apocalyptic eschatology-the preaching of Jesus, because we can not be entirely sure that it was his own, ends up Käsemann attributed to Jesus's conception most likely of all ( worse, the "kingdom of wisdom" of Crossan!) ossia the ermeneutica escatologica di Rudolf Bultmann!

But, unlike the excesses of Dodd and his assertion of eschatology already completed, it will be necessary to grant that Jesus spoke of the Kingdom of God in the future. The problem is only in what sense he's right. In the words of Jesus, it is clear however that seems Basileia making their way on land, and placing men in front of their news and before the decision between obedience and disobedience. (...) Because Jesus came not to preach the truths générales, Religieuses ou morales, corn pour ce qu'il en est de say the Basileia here commence à paraître, c'est-à-say que Dieu s'est approche de l'homme dans la grâce et l'exigence

Exaggerations and paradoxes of the criterion of discontinuity or double dissimilarity, right now reinterpreted by Gerd Theissen as "contextual plausibility (ie, its originality in a fundamental affinity) and Tom Holmen dissimilarity as" one way ", ie exclusively from the community after Easter, and not in relation to Judaism of the time.

( citazioni riprese da: E. Käsemann, Essais exégétiques , Delachaux & Nestlié, Neuchatel, 1972, p. 171)

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Cartoon [big Women] Images

JP Meier Jimmy Dunn, a marginal error ...? The best

Perhaps the common mistake of so much of the quest for the historical Jesus in the last two centuries was that it was not a truly historical quest at all. More often than not, it was an attempt at a more modern form of Christology masquerading as a historical quest (…) it was used to re-articulate Christology in more contemporary and scientific modes – think, for instance, of Joachim Jeremias or Ben Meyer.

(…) I see the important work of NT Wright ( Jesus and the Victory of God, Christian Origins and the Question of God 2 , Minneapolis, Fortress, 1996) in this light. In other words, I consider the book not an example of the quest for the historical Jesus as such, but rather a prime example of how one goes about appropriating results of the quest for a larger theological/Christological project. The matter is more complicated when it comes to the fine work of James D.G. Dunn Jesus Remembered ( Christology in the making 1: Grand Rapids, MI/Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans, 2003). Much in this individual volume can stand on its own as a treatment of the historical Jesus. As the title of the series indicates, though, this volume is viewed as part of a larger Christological project .

(J.P. Meier, A Marginal Jew. Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Vol. 4: Law and Love , Yale University Press, 2009, New Haven/London, p. 6 e p. 23, n. 17)

Difficilmente si potrà contestare l’affermazione che we mentioned in Meier, page. 6 of its new fourth volume of A Marginal Jew. Perhaps it would be quite an exaggeration to say that the historical Jesus really was born with only historical EP Sanders. Nothing to say about this then. But the problems come with the footnote 17 (p. 23) that also fits the work of Meier Wright and Dunn, as examples of: 1) theological appropriation of the results of historical research (Wright), 2) the historical reconstruction service of a larger project-christological theological (Dunn).

Both points are highly questionable. Sorry, but Wright is not a theologian, who appropriates the results of historical criticism, or at least not in its Jesus & the Victory of God . What Meier Wright suits do not apply to him, but the works of Pannenberg, Kasper, Küng, Schillebeeckx, O'Collins, Bordoni, Sobrino, Schwarz, McDermott, Gamberini etc. Here are we to do with Christology that are siphoning off the results of historical research. But with Wright, however, have one student that [at least in his book on Jesus, the speech is rather different with regard to the overall project, as you might guess from the title reference to "The Question of God "] is proposed in the guise of historical, not a theologian. The questions that drive his work are: " How does Jesus fit into the Judaism of His day? What Were His AIMS? Why did he die? How did the early church as into Being, and why did it take the shape it did? and Why Are What They Are the Gospels? ( Jesus & the Victory of God , p. 90). That is, questions which lie mostly in a historical perspective, so at least nominally related to the program Sanders highlight the "connective links" (" there was a substantial consistency between what Jesus had in mind, the way in which saw the relationship with their nation and the religion of his people, the reason for his death and the beginning of the Christian movement "EP Sanders, Jesus and Judaism , London, Edward Arnold, 1990, p. 36). It is not that Wright is not a historian: the problem is rather that his historical reconstruction is based on an approach to the synoptic tradition that is no exaggeration to define -critical, in which not only told a parable or is declared inauthentic. It is therefore not, as Meier says, that his work is not an example of historical research on Jesus, is simply not a good example.

But the misunderstanding is even more in the way Meier framing the work of Dunn. As acknowledged by Meier himself, Jesus Remembered is a full work on the historical Jesus, and above all considerable level. At best, you may consider a "legacy" of "Christological interest," the considerable space devoted to the question of how Jesus understood himself (Part IV, pp.615-764), which is just a typical depth of Christological approaches, including whether by itself may simply be a question of historical (such as. in The Historical Figure of Jesus by EP Sanders ). But Meier dramatic make a mistake by claiming that, although a historical work, the Dunn's Jesus Remembered is part of a broader project Christological, for he is confusing the series in question ( Christianity in the Making - which has now been published the second volume, Beginning from Jerusalem, which - which may be questionable for his positions - is itself a work purely on the historical origins of the church) with a justly famous and important work of New Testament Christology of that Dunn, who was called, yes!, Christology in the Making (SCM Press, London, 1980 and subsequent editions) .

In short, while in terms of Wright, the error is intentional and is certainly a way to distance itself from His work in the most polite and politically correct as possible (not saying it is a historical rather than recognize that it is simply a bad historical work!), in the case of Dunn's error is probably unintentional, nevertheless seems bizarre, especially if we consider that Jesus Remembered goes to the back cover of your praise Meier!

A marginal ... mistake?

Monday, June 15, 2009

Electronic Thermostat Hac

Jesus' scholar of this aeon: poll reopened!

reopened the poll. You have until 2012 to vote for the best Quester this Jesus was, then - according to the latest rumors - the world should Finally, and then you will never have an opportunity to express your preferences. Hurry up then.
Compared with the former survey, as you may have noticed, have become substantially more candidates vying for the coveted award. There are all right, of course, but almost.
The survey was suspended with the following partial ranking:

6: Barbaglio
5: Fish
3: Benedict XVI, Jeremias, Meier
2: Allison, Chilton (clamoroso!), Ehrman, Joss, Messori (since ousted ex officio), Puig i Tarrech, Ricciotti, Sanders
1: Berger, Charlesworth, Dunn, Fredriksen, Horsley

A league characterized by a significant trend-conservative apologetics (see Benedict XVI, Messori, Ricciotti, Puig, Berger and in a sense also Jeremias), although at the top there are moderate to liberal scholars such as Fish and glare. Amazingly however, the preference for double Bruce Chilton, of which Italy has not been translated into anything.
But now on! By 2012 anything can happen, that even the latest (i Crossan, Borg and Mack with a loud collective zero) to become the first ...

PS
the total number of votes that appear now (below) includes solo i voti dalla riapertura (o nuova creazione) del sondaggio, non invece quelli del sondaggio vecchio, che sono stati tuttavia ugualmente ri-assegnati ai singoli studiosi.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

How Long Should I Fry Italian Sausage

The Roman Republic of 1849: 160 years after

Rome, 05/05/2009. Meeting with Claudio Fracassi
Tuesday, May 5 21.00 at: Centro Socio Cultural Garbatella

The Roman Republic of 1849: 160 anni dopo
Roma, 5-5-2009. Incontro con Claudio Fracassi autore de La meravigliosa storia della repubblica dei briganti (2005) e de La Ribelle e Il Papa Re (2009) a cura del Gruppo Laico di ricerca
Associazione culturale GRUPPO LAICO DI RICERCA 2009

LA REPUBBLICA ROMANA del 1849: 160 anni dopo…
Il 25 novembre del 1848 Pio IX fugge a Gaeta ed il 9 febbraio 1849 viene proclamata la seconda Repubblica romana, il cui decreto recita all'articolo 3: "La forma del Governo dello Stato Romano sarà la democrazia pura". Un esperimento fondamentale, se pur drammaticamente breve, per poter costruire un’Italia e una città di Roma libere da ingerenze clericali e una democrazia of very thick. An experiment to remember and rediscover in an Italy that is well away from those ideals and any form of secularism.

Tuesday, May 5 21.00

The historical legacy of the first experiment of an Italy republican, secular and democratic.
Meeting with Claudio Fracassi
at: Centro Socio Cultural Garbatella

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Things To Write In My Sister's Birthday Card

Invitation - Presentation of the fourth issue

The fourth issue of "the Roman Republic" tries to explain just come out with more breadth of arguments - now has four pages - the sense a new republicanism, opposition to national politics, a path independence. With Rome, its history and its relevance to the heart of things. A new "Roman Question."
We invite the submission of this new number, Friday ', April 3 at 18 at the library on a Flexi Clementine, 9 - upstream. It is an opportunity to meet, to discuss together the "do." Put it on the agenda.
you expect to Friday

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Harley Springer Wheel

silent, politicians!

Tears, Sweat and Tears
blood, sweat and blood. So the politicians tell us the economic crisis. But will our tears, not theirs. Our sweat and blood, not theirs. Politicians call us to mobilize, as in war, against enemies far away and invisible: finance wicked, perverse globalization. But in the land of the trenches we stand. We ask to hold on, pull the belt: courage and sacrifices are not their bread and butter, but ours.



Tears, sweat and blood. The crisis is the new religion, the new monotheism, the new god awful face now to turn to charity and now our prayers. Performed or unconcealed, in chorus sung or whispered, as every religion is used to intimidate and to seek solace. The crisis is supernatural, not human, not names, addresses, managers: and would save us all to believe with blind faith in their formulas, in their rituals, in their incense.
Tears, sweat and blood. Who tells how things go in the world, owns the world. Now there is only one book in the world: the crisis. The stories are impoverished, the words are impoverished. The crisis is the new liturgy, the new narrative of power.
But here we want to tell another story: a story of production and science, technology and prosperity, and wealth distribution, autonomy and independence, intelligence and knowledge, self-government and freedom, feelings and rights, to territories and community, present and future. Here it tells another story. Who tells how things go in the world, owns the world.
It will also be true - as they say in Palazzo - that "sooner or later the crisis pass, that crises are cyclical, and after all we make it," but we do not see blue skies over our heads, but a storm. This is not just that exploded "economy", is the crisis of their world, their principles, their rules, their institutions. The world has gone to pieces because they no longer work those principles, those rules, those institutions. It does not work anymore because they can not understand and represent our attitudes, our needs and our desires. We are not catastrophic, but it is obvious that none of them understood the crisis that arrived: anyone really still believe that fairy tale fifty thousand billion dollars - the "price" of the global product of a year - have gone up in smoke for four U.S. subprime mortgage on the house and forty thieves? What is a kind of global Tangentomondo of rogues? And none of them has the faintest idea how to lift ourselves out. Alembic ideas, now that this project now, they pull for the day. The only thing holding up a bit, 'as sandbags while all overflows are the vestiges of the welfare state that left and right for years have reduced or dismantled. Fallen into a sink, out of his mind, trying to get out the hair rising.
But it is the power of technique that has subverted the rules, not the crisis: we are not only vastly more productive than our fathers, but we can not be convicted of the work. We are not only vastly more productive than our fathers, but may be less. We can condemn us to live without work. We can live a rich life and non-poor, socially marginal and not ambitious and not without condemning the shabby work. This is the knowledge that gave us the technique, which gave us the development of our productive power: we can do without the work. That we should not be dead to do without the work. We may be interested in the world, heal the world and ourselves, without being slave labor. We have always asked ourselves: How posso fare di questa cosa un’altra?, ora possiamo chiederci: Come dare valore alla nostra vita? A Palazzo, questo non va giù. Il risparmio di lavoro si rovescia in disoccupazione. Schiavi del lavoro, morti di lavoro dobbiamo restare. Con la deregulation , eravamo elemosinanti di lavoro, con la new regulation saremo elemosinanti di lavoro.
Ma è la prossimità del mondo che ha sovvertito le regole, non la crisi: mangiamo, vestiamo, usiamo, guardiamo cose inimmaginabili per i nostri padri, possiamo andare ovunque e da ovunque possono venire da noi. Vediamo cose che per i nostri padri appartenevano a un altro mondo. Ora sono a portata di mano. Adesso sappiamo suoni e colori e odori che nemmeno conoscevamo. All this scary - we ourselves are scared, having lost identity and security, those who were our fathers - but it fascinates us. Never a man could have such a feeling of belonging that the whole of humanity and the whole of humanity belongs to them: we feel that there is a reason for our being in the world. We have always asked ourselves: Who are we?, Now we ask: What can we? A Palazzo, this does not go down. Enemies of each other, hostile of our loneliness, avid defenders of possessions, of our limitations we have to stay.
But the discoveries of science who have subverted the rules, not the crisis: we discover that we have a lot more tempo di quello che hanno avuto i nostri padri per le loro vite, che i nostri corpi possono essere meglio medicati e sanati, che possono restare vitali a lungo, che i nostri sentimenti di affetto e di amicizia possono perdurare. I limiti della vita e della morte si spostano, le forme della riproduzione si modificano, i nuclei di relazione della nostra intimità oltrepassano la famiglia tradizionale legata al sangue. Siamo stupefatti e turbati di queste possibilità, come se la scienza ci donasse tante altre vite, invece di quella sola che ci dà la natura, con una sola storia. Siamo cauti, ma procediamo per sperimentare, perché chi venga dopo trovi ancora più possibilità, più opportunità, più speranze. Trovi meno dolore, più wisdom and happiness. A Palazzo, this does not go down. Damn obscurantist, for them the sun always runs around a flat earth because it is in darkness that can control our fear.
is the power of the technique is the proximity to the world, are the discoveries of science - the processes that make the man "in common" with himself and with others - that have subverted the rules, not the crisis. The crisis comes after the crisis is now to stop everything. Better to destroy the wealth, which allow it to distribute and reproduce out of control. So plot at the Palace. It is the building that became insolvent, not this or that bank. Enormous accumulation capital - fifty thousand billion dollars - instead of being invested in technology, for more prosperity and less work in science for better health and less pain, in the proximity of the world, for more freedom of movement and less boundaries, it is remained a "sign", the virtual currency of account, as it put under the mattress, went up in smoke. She's dead. They are stupid or evil? They are stupid and evil. Destroying it, duly compensated hierarchies and authority, the centrality of states and nations, we must rebuild and reconvicted the rules of the need, the duty, necessity, and labor, we must restrict the borders and let us defend our homelands, we must let Providence take its course.
So it goes in the world. This is the story we tell: beyond the crisis, the Palace is no more state and more difficult for us more freedom and more happiness.
This story told in the territories where we're at home, in the cities where we live, the places we love and we pay attention, for which we stand, because this is where we play our lives, this is where we build our relationships , this is where our "pride" - the feeling of care of our uniqueness - it becomes "common place" with others. The recount in Rome because it is here that we have the chance and the privilege of living.
a privilege, because living in Rome is also to be told by history, measured at each step with a "laboratory" for centuries, the day before yesterday, where the power, technology, the proximity of the world, science - time in turn, over time - have built an idea of \u200b\u200bfreedom, rights, happiness, citizenship, universality.
If there is a place where the most painful and jarring is the sloppiness of power, neglect of the domain, the mediocrity of command - the sloppiness, carelessness, the mediocrity of the Palace - this is Rome, because here, and therefore belongs to the world, are still visible and the signs of a perennial attempt to find a great and terrible measure of his finitude and eternity, between its uniqueness and universality, between the utility and beauty, between the rights and freedoms, including their home and public space. Free
Rome, fighting for the independence of Rome, then, means to give back to ourselves and the world these questions, looking for answers in the present, in the now, the hour and here.
and Rome that we want to talk. Its political independence, its independence of the production.

Searches Independence
The process of political independence is intertwined and based on the processes of independence of work.
This independence of the work is a bastard, and there is no "pure" in nature. Not be traced by means of economic indicators: number of employees, capital, volume of transactions, or the size or scale. Or for contractual arrangements by which you configure: permanent, fixed-term, project, part-time. It is not self-employment or gainful employment. It is not recognizable to the ways of its implementation, if a sample is carried out by treating language, signs, communications, forms, visions, or whether it is accustomed to manually hardness of iron and concrete: there are rabid dogs growling behind the apparent inconsistency of things, and vice versa open hearts and open minds that no roughness can scratch daily. Neither is identified through the materiality or immateriality of products: there are intangible products highly toxic to the social and vice versa very tangible benefits. There is no evidence for the "quality", the beauty and the cultural value of the product: there are products that are absolutely extraordinary bill unnecessary, or for small niches, and vice versa aesthetic products that create low relief and satisfaction in wide circles. And there are creative work that we could happily do without, and executive work is absolutely necessary. It is characterized by the property form: there are small production, VAT or cooperatives where the true forms of carrion use slave labor among its employees, and vice versa, there are public institutions and private companies in whose crevices and streams of cash flows and survive you adoprano people of great dignity and moral integrity. It is not pauperistic - as if the effort was to claim to be poor - and not squandered in gold.
The independence of the work is identified for 'street sentimental "is the sentiment that marks the self-employment.
This sentiment has the characters of attention, dell’affetto, dell’amicizia, della dedica e potremmo definirlo di «cura»: cura persino maniacale per quel che si compie, attenzione per tutte le cose e le persone che si coinvolgono, affetto e amicizia per le situazioni che si incontrano, che ci stanno intorno e verso e dentro le quali si svolge il nostro lavoro. E questo sia che l’attività lavorativa abbia un ambito familista sia di piccola azienda o di corporation o statale. La cura, insomma, è il tratto distintivo dei sentimenti che pervadono il lavoro indipendente, perché nella cura è riconoscibile la personalizzazione di quel che si compie, l’individuazione del nostro lavoro, il rapporto tra le nostre mani e la nostra faccia, e per questo tramite la its 'value', ie its use and its exchange, thus effectively the economic aspect but also the social sense.
not enough that we do things useful to us, that we put passion, enthusiasm, pleasure, and we gain satisfaction, tangible or intangible: the independence of working for our independence, not just our declaration of independence - like that of income. We need a "distinction" social, public. It is outside of us that the independence of our work takes the form, it is in "social opinion" that it becomes real. There are others who can tell us independent, others are making independent il nostro lavoro. In questo senso, il lavoro indipendente vive «dell’altrui» più che «del proprio».
Perché il lavoro indipendente costruisce «spazio e tempo» per la vita pubblica di relazione: è questa la sua «merce». Sia un luogo, un momento, un oggetto, una suggestione, un gusto, un progetto, un servizio, una risposta o una domanda, che si consuma da soli o scambiandolo con amici o in piccoli gruppi o dentro una folla, quello che si vive attraverso questa merce, anche attraverso la vita privata, è il senso di appartenere alla vita pubblica, di parteciparvi, di contribuirvi, di edificarla. Vita pubblica, vita sociale, vita cittadina, vita civile, vita attiva. Il lavoro indipendente rende comune la vita privata, come fosse la lettura in pubblico di pagine di un libro che si sono già amate seduti nelle proprie case.
Questa indipendenza del lavoro peraltro non si dà una volta per tutte. Proprio perché caratterizzata dai sentimenti, essa è soggetta ai cicli dei sentimenti, alle crisi, ai disamoramenti, alle improvvise passioni, ai tradimenti, agli abbandoni, ai ritorni e, appunto, alla fine. Certo, può capitare che siano le condizioni esterne a imporre una dura legge dell’esistenza – la crisi economica colpisce adesso soprattutto chi è indipendente, perché la circolazione monetaria s’è ristretta. Ma, più spesso, capita invece che un giorno ci si accorga di sentirsi logori and tired, and you decide to accept the offer favorable and diabolical that until then had refused, and closes the shop, you pass the level, you change the characteristics of your product or the industry, turned their gaze , his wisdom and intelligence of all those things that before were considered absurd, and those persons and situations that they felt distant. Maybe, in fact they go out, and look, his wisdom, his intelligence, almost always, are not required. It becomes, in short, 'officials' less worries, less responsibility, less slamming.
But here is a crux of the matter: while the self-employed building society, life report, understandable and recognizable and enjoyable to those who use and exchange, at the same time is able to weave relationships within it. Why is not a social area, a class, a class - something recognizable through the Economic Survey, sociological or private law - the "fifth state" that moves: it is a movement, that is a real dynamic tension and a great walking in a range that goes apart, independence on the one hand, "common" other. And this is the fragility of their awareness that makes temporary and ephemeral social life that constructs, or "common" it produces.
But the answer to this question is not a trade union, as it was to found the independent trade union of workers. Too many of the independence of working conditions, precarious this guarantee, an individual company here in there a chain of compartments, here stifled by taxes and levies there without a shred of pay slips. Everyone does and will do their union battle. The central point is through the mediation of self-employment, private and social life, use and exchange, which binds to and is the glue, which reverse the atomization of the work a sense of joint production: this is the means territory, the city is Rome.
in the report is aware and conscious and direct link between self-employment and the area between the work and independence that Rome is the heart of things. It is in demand all government policy independent of Rome, which is the heart of things.
is here, however, this "feeling" that the independence of the work will be independent from the work: when the process of economic independence to become yourself wholly process of political independence.

The new "Roman question"
Rome today is little more than a geographical expression. His story - which inspired the great political revolutions of modernity - a small school knowledge or trivial information leaflets to throngs of tourists broken. The dream that saw the recapture of renaissance Rome and its role in the founding capital of a nation marked by the spirit of that story has turned into its opposite: the national policy has occupied the city as waves of barbarians sacked. National politicians manage the huge flow of financial taxation, direct and indirect, such as old landowners, owners of a "rent" that is just the parasitic exploitation and corruption of what our community life is able to produce and consume. National politicians are a tyranny of the "dead hand". The management of public affairs is the network of canals and drains of these cash flows: as the cloaca maxima . From inside, you can only impregnate. It should be out in the process of independence, is in the open air is only possible to reconstruct the policy as a civic duty, ambition to excel with the great, the service life of active sociality which one belongs.
is time to reclaim Rome itself. Italy is now in shreds and tatters, including certificates of areas north and south, regions and areas, small "kingdoms" local "Grand Duchy 'held together by a regime led as a monarchy that gradually corrupts democracy in authoritarian forms of fiction with a unitary state which is exercised especially here a Roma, gravando con un peso insopportabile.
E intanto lo Stato pontificio, invece di restare condizionato al suo ruolo spirituale, ha ingigantito la sua «presa» sui corpi e sulle menti, ponendosi come ultima autorità e producendo amministratori e cittadini deboli, superstiziosi, impauriti.
Roma è ormai città di rappresentanza, di rappresentazioni nazionali e internazionali: serve per fornire palazzi e giardini, scenografie che grondano storia – e che dovrebbero incutere rispetto e timore, risvegliare onore e gloria di spirito pubblico, invece del banale luogo comune della “dolce vita” – ma che sono diventate poco più che fondali di scena, dove si mimano interessi e diplomazie già decisi altrove. Quale miserabile fine!
È tempo di liberare Roma: la liberazione di Roma è di nuovo all’ordine del giorno della storia. Roma libera, sia il nostro grido.
Non ci anima alcun localismo, alcun nazionalismo, alcun municipalismo: nessuno spirito di «suolo e sangue». D’altra parte, come sarebbe mai possibile circoscrivere, separare Roma dal resto del mondo, dell’umanità? Semmai, al contrario, si tratta proprio di restituire Roma al mondo, di rifondare il suo ruolo storico di città universale.
Non ci anima alcun interesse privato. Quello che possediamo – i nostri talenti, le nostre conoscenze, le nostre capacità – rimane sempre con noi. Quello che noi vogliamo è the right to use this in our capacity as they see fit, not to put "a master" - whether public or corporate, does not matter - they do not know and do not give a damn to do well.
There is no soul supreme interest and an ultimate goal: the Company, the general will, the spirit of history.
But this policy is no longer able to protect ourselves, to protect the wealth we produce and protect our own lives. This policy is leading us to ruin. And the solutions that promises to ignorance and unconsciousness - a reduction of social prosperity, mobility, science, trade, a new state with more eyes, still più autarchico, ancora più militarizzato –, sono quasi peggiori dei pericoli che incombono e che ci minacciano. Controllo nazionale delle banche, controllo nazionale delle aziende, controllo nazionale degli scambi, controllo nazionale della democrazia: questo è il «pubblico» che avanza. Non è in un mondo più chiuso che è la nostra salvezza, non è in un mondo più ignorante che è la nostra salvezza, non è in un mondo con più birri e più forche che è la nostra salvezza. Forse servono a loro queste cose, a fare sentire loro più sicuri, non noi. Un nuovo mondo di tecnica, di prossimità, di scienza sta premendo. Un diritto inalienabile di vivere indipendentemente sta premendo. Se questa condizione non trova «forma», diritti materiali, se non trova una nuova sovranità, una nuova autorità, si dilania, impazzisce, divora se stesso. È questo il «pericolo pubblico» che ci minaccia. Se entriamo in un ospedale non sappiamo se ne usciremo vivi, se camminiamo per strada non sappiamo se verremo travolti, se andiamo al lavoro non sappiamo se a sera torneremo a casa: come ricostruiamo responsabilità individuale e collettiva? Col terrore? È vero, questo Paese è andato avanti per via di consuetudini spesso al limite quando non fuori dalle regole. Ma erano le regole che non funzionavano, non le consuetudini: le consuetudini facevano andare avanti le cose. Ripristinare le regole, che già non funzionavano, throttling means everything, narrow them again, when everything is blown, it's just a terror operation. And fear leads to ruin. Never before has our personal lives, our own lives are being pushed towards public life, to the "common" to the city.
is a new republicanism what motivates us, is a new republic that we aspire to, is a new Roman Republic that we dream. A
organize freedom, how it could be a free Rome from tyranny and the abuse of national policy papist, we can think of right away: there are talents and skills, experience and generosity, even now in a position to draw a different city. E semplice da amministrare. Lo faremo.
Ma il nodo centrale è il potere. Ed è bene dirlo fuori dai denti, a lettere cubitali, per essere chiari, limpidi e comprensibili. Tutte le lotte e le battaglie saranno conquiste necessarie ma finché il potere non sarà nelle nostre mani, finché sul Campidoglio non svetterà la bandiera della nuova Repubblica romana saranno temporanee. E affinché quella bandiera sventoli è necessaria un’insurrezione. Nessuna congiura, nessuna clandestinità, nessuna carboneria, nessun pugnale nell’ombra. La «nostra» insurrezione è alla luce del sole. È pubblica. È per la democrazia. È per la produzione. È per lo scambio. La nostra insurrezione non aspetta l’ora X, è già cominciata. La nostra insurrezione è permanente. È nel Risvegliamento delle coscienze e degli spiriti, nella fierezza del sentimento repubblicano, nell’opposizione strenua alla coatteria morale, al degrado del senso civico, alla corruzione della politica, è qui che è già cominciata la nostra insurrezione.
La liberazione di Roma è di nuovo all’ordine del giorno della storia.
Tacete, politici!
Roma libera, è il nostro grido. Accorrete! Accorrete!

Scarica qui il pdf

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Arm Pain From Shoulder To Pinky

statement of February 9, 2009

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

How To Get Rid Of Your Infant's Phlem

are having difficulty


"We are in crisis, we are in recession." It is the chant of these months, the jingle of the bottom of every question, every debate, every argument: there is no money for investment, there is no money for repairs and maintenance, there is no money for recruitment, there is no money for care, there is no money to renew the agreements, there is no money for research, there is no money for the events, there is no money for advertising and promotions. There is no money at all. We ass on the ground with water in the throat, with shit up to the neck. And the worst is yet to come. The statistics bear out the prophecy seem forecasts a long, cold winter, all scored below zero. We do not produce, do not buy, do not save, do not cr esciamo. Who knows what we are doing in the meantime.
The crisis is told as "history" of a financial speculators out of control from the power of central banks and governments. Instead, there are no innocents: the central banks and governments knew and allowed any speculation, sure to hold the money "fantasy," and indeed intent on exploiting volume and seamless mobility, without laws of gravity to pump and economies consumption. To build consensus. And besides, this is money 'invented', to produce and consume. A building consenso. Una bolla finanziaria è stata fatta lievitare per sostenere il crollo di un’altra. Non ci sono innocenti: il «sogno» di fare denaro standosene in panciolle con in tasca il biglietto vincente della
lotteria aveva ca tturato facilmente risparmiatori di ogni risma e taglia. Non c’entra niente la non-corrispondenza fra economia «materiale» e «immateriale». È da un bel pezzo che a tot moneta, a tot valore non corrispondono tot merci, all’incirca da quando sono nate le banche e il credito. La folle corsa al nuovo Eldorado si basava su un dato ben materiale: una illimitata possibilità di produrre e consumare del mondo, era questo il «futuro» su cui si rischiava, un future without scarcity. This possibility has not produced a match-and a conflict between values \u200b\u200b- the present and the future, the money supply and credit, prices and profits - not between values \u200b\u200band goods. A confusion of temporality, between now and tomorrow.
The goods we are now in the middle. The work we are now in the middle. They are the "collateral damage". They speak of an overall "wealth destruction," but our ability to produce is intact, our creativity is undiminished, our technology is intact. Was also an apocalypse, is not that the next day would become troglodytes, illiterate, savage, regressing to the stone age: the we do, our knowledge, our skills, our knowledge remain the same. What is jammed, what went out of control is what did not work before. The ability to produce any goods at low cost is now high, the possibility of obtaining raw materials at fair prices, has now extended the opportunity to trade and exchange has become a common practice everywhere. But this wealth, this strength concrete, real, material is mortified and deformed. Jammed, it forced the "private" instead of for someone to wealth for all. For them, the wealth, it our wealth, should be aimed at profit; For us, wealth means free from difficulty, to live a better and peaceful life, dedicated to the happiness. Only the profit - greed for profit, not just earnings - has become anachronistic. It has played a role in the overall production of goods, when the world was scarred and wounded by the need by need, by scarcity. It was the spring individual who has worked longer and better than any attraction collectivist. Today is historically illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional. Today the private hoard spring, that it may be only against the push for common growth, is disgusting and unbearable. And like everything anachronistic, lacking di senso comune, perché sussistano ancora il suo dominio e i suoi privilegi già dati, diventa violento. Stupidamente, odiosamente violento.
Niente sarà più come prima, dicono adesso. Ma suona più come una minaccia che come un programma di interventi economici. E d’altronde, quali mai «misure» è possibile adoperare – se non ripescando vecchie formule e esperienze – in un mondo, in un tempo che ha a portata di mano nuove forme e nuove istituzioni del produrre e del vivere supportate da una straordinaria possibilità della scienza e della tecnica che rimettono in discussione i «fondamenti» del nostro esserci? Tutto è vecchio, mostruosamente vecchio, quando occorrerebbero invece coraggio, determination, imagination.
A neo-statism, in the form of a revised Keynesian or protectionism reduced pitch or combination of formulas in alliances among states, seems the most common recipe. Yet there can be no "plans" to overcome the national crisis, whose contours are supranational nature. But there is an added "political" of the crisis can be managed locally: a "political advantage" fell from the sky. In that cling national governments and local governments. And were told to keep good acting on our worst sides. Ideological mobilization - Retrieve values \u200b\u200band flags, to homelands and nations, religions and traditions - e risibili provvedimenti economici andranno di pari passo. La crisi è tutta sulle nostre spalle. Il mondo è tutto sulle nostre spalle.
Bene, azzeriamo tutto allora. Default. Ma ai nastri di partenza di questa nuova corsa non ci stanno solo loro. Ci siamo pure noi. Noi e la nostra ricchezza. Noi e la nostra potenza.

La politica ci salverà?
Quelli che ci hanno mandati a ramengo nella crisi, quelli che dovevano controllare, vigilare, stare attenti, quelli che insomma dovevano fare il loro mestiere – il mestiere per cui li abbiamo votati e delegati, e per cui li paghiamo, cioè: governare – e che se ne sono bellamente strafottuti, per intrallazzo, per ambizione, per totale ignoranza e incompetence are the same pundits are now and want to save: they, the politicians, administrators, the courtiers of the Palace. Something does not return.
Something just does not come back if the person who left us the first sink and then throws a lifeline to us has the same face. Something just does not come back if all they have put together measures are: faith and hope. While we stand with bowed head and hat in hand and pray and thank them devout, God-fearing and intimidated by the Apocalypse to come, while making them?
In the crisis, they are not solving the problem are part of the problem. It's their system that goes to pieces, not ours. Are their rules did not work, not ours. Their institutions are not governed, not ours. And now they want to give him a hand? Indeed, efforts and sacrifices they ask us, solidarity and sacrifice, patience and endurance, confidence and serenity. They want us to be virtuous. We ask for our money - those who have and those that we have - both, they all pay with our money, we are their cash, their credit card limits. And we should spend our wealth to them, we should invest everything we have on them, we should bet on the bet that they represent? Sorry, eh, but go fuck yourself, right?
says, but the crisis is global, the Americans, the Germans, are the French, even the Chinese know '- they could do? But how, they have made us a head like that with globalization and the market here and the market there, which was a world of milk and honey, and mo 'are telling us that that was the hell? Today they say the opposite of yesterday, yesterday said the opposite of today, tomorrow who knows what they will say, what matters is that they remain where they are always telling us what is the right thing. Sorry, eh, but a bit 'of shame, no? All I propose is a revival of self-sufficiency - 'Italian consumer "- and a new austerity, all they can say now is that I know gl'Americani' too strong, yogurt, jam, however, is perhaps better than if magnamo du 'macaroni? But I really believe that we are so fooled by any canard Berci tell us?
We have started a transition to the future, in the end of this time. A transition will be painless and will not conflict and turmoil. Everywhere, in every territory, in every city. Here. In this city. Rule this time is not bread for their teeth.

they go away
We are the riches of this city. Rome is full of our wealth, our talents, our creativity, our ability to invent and produce, our desires, our curiosity, of our special quality of building relationships, our desire to live better, our search for happiness. Each in its own way and what can and can do. This site belongs to us, this city belongs to us. This town is our town. We work for some time, to invest our knowledge and our jobs in the public and private sectors. This city has ceased to be under the thumb of provincial and Oltretevere with the end of the long Democrat power, with the great wave of people who had lived through the changes and hopes of the movements of the sixties and seventies and gradually entered the professions, crafts, in trade, jobs, innovations and bringing cultures, languages and circulation of ideas, views and visions, bringing a huge potential for cooperation and social relationships, doing so with little, making the "fortune" of being where there is the greatest asset of humanity, highlighting the extraordinary collective resource that is Rome. Inventing "forms of use 'who rediscover the story - the meaning and beauty of its space - be it daily, but," easy ", as if in thought. All those who have followed the Rome government did nothing to build on this capability, grab it. As it is now appropriate the work of those producers of imagery and culture in recent years were born and raised in Rome - certainly not through the auditorium and the film festival of Veltroni and Bettini, inherited and corrected by Alemanno and Croppi - and that makes movies, video, theater, music, advertising, books, producing things for a good live.
is time to declare our independence. It's time to rule ourselves: any caregiver will be more capable and more care in managing, administering, of them.
are having difficulty, it's their system, the crisis of our wealth. They are the "absolute evil": their tax system, their banking system, their legal system, their distribution system. They are a hindrance to our ability to produce, our ability to create, invent. Really, we can not: we manage our money and squander them begrudge them, we have entrusted our assets - our history, our memory, our beauty, our culture, our property - and if they snap up , neglect them or attempt to destroy, they can not provide for the needs of the city as the minimum daily exceptional situations of emergency. They, the politicians, with priests, bankers and real estate agents.
This city is becoming a place whatsoever, a city-postcard of a city-crib, a city brochure. A mediocre city. A shadowy place, a city that looks like any other, that is consumed like any other, where there is no relationship between the history el'adesso, between what we were and what we are. It is emptied of itself, is a copy of itself, something that can be well in Las Vegas or Disneyland. A place at the same time and armored sloppy, sloppy for us and for them armored. Inside
their crisis, we are facing further instability of work, wage compression, lack of social protection and guarantees, for them, it would be the mandatory order "not to interfere with the maneuver. Their formula out of the crisis, reconstruction of the law of profit has only one ingredient: reducing work in forms of servitude.
That, ladies politicians and administrators of our boots, we give you this news: you've come to an end, it's time to get down. Do not know how to do your job, your profession and we have been. The city will revoke the sovereign mandate, we will be dismissed. You are policy
defaulting tenants, you are abusive. Been illegally occupying our center, our home, our "palaces." If the policemen of this city were less committed to breaking balls to street vendors and the Roma or take bribes and give the sick, and worked a bit ', they should be there in the House, at Palazzo Chigi, the Capitol, on Colombo to evict , to put the seals with the bailiff should.
You have made the political center of Rome a place you, disfigured, making us pay twice the weight of the doubly odious national power and local power. Have you just expanded, with your office, your secretaries, your library, your stocks, your guest quarters and your garçonnieres. Running around town with your blue car. It is time for you leviate of the way, we restituiate our spaces. We'll be generous: go away, beyond the ring road, go away in a detention center, a center of political temporary everything for you. You can play right, center and left as you like, we have to stew for a long time already. At least you're not between your toes, do not give too much bother and already has a thing.

I am my
is time to declare our independence. If there really is something that this crisis demonstrates very clearly is that economic interventions "unthinkable" - the money at no cost, working hours slashed by half to equal pay - are already possible for some time. If there really is something that this crisis demonstrates very clearly is that we live below our means, and not above as they would like to convince us - "He squandered too much," they say - to continue to be delayed. Reformists and conservatives speak the same voice cracked. Quite the contrary, we want so much and everything. We want invent, produce, exchange and consumption. We want to be desired. Those who have few privileges - a safe and comfortable life full of pleasure and beauty - may be opportunities for everyone. The materials are now all possible, to meet your needs. Instead, we are in an economically depressed does not make it to rebound to force the gags and jokes.
But we live below our freedoms. The time of unlimited mass production is finished, the time of unlimited availability to consumers is over. It was the time of vehicles and machinery, and human labor. It also ended the days of unlimited willingness to delegate policy. It was the time totalitarianism and democracy. It is the sunset of a civilization, not only of a system, a civilization that has made the work and production of its power and hegemony, and on work and production has lost its primacy. It happens in history. It goes on. Yet it is the policy of our great history and tradition, the invention of political rights and freedoms. The invention of political revolution. This is what our history has given the world. This is what we can still give to the world. It is our true 'excellence'. It is our policy.
The revolution will be young and Republican. The republic that will be, will be autonomous, free and independent. Roman will. He will live in the decision-making capacity and the expression of each. Representative democracy, which also played an important and extraordinary, is now an empty shell. Was based on a relationship between work and citizenship which does not exist in most forms of the twentieth century. You can not restore or re-found, knows the reaction: the populist tendencies, the small countries in Europe and govern burst. Fill that void so horrible, bring back the clock of history. They even can win briefly, but not stand.
We, we want to fill that void of new republican virtues, new mercies, new freedoms, new happiness, of new institutions.
We want to make Rome the honor of its history, its political history, of its sovereignty. Why is a new way to live in the world.

Write to repubblicaromana@gmail.com
Download the pdf